Tuesday, March 21, 2017

Santideva and Bodhicharyavatara: A Close Reading

   


Sumanapal Bhikkhu

When we look at the history of Buddhism we find that in the Mahayana scriptures two concepts are the most profound, sublime and influential. These are the concepts of Bodhisattva and Sunyata. According to the ‘Vajrachedika Prajna Paramita Sutra the ideal of Bodhisattva is, “Never abandon all beings and to see into the truth that all things are empty.” The Bodhisattva ideal evolved from the Bodhisattva concept of the Pali Nikaya and gradually spread to a large part of Asia, particularly China, Japan, Korea and Vietnam. This form of Mahayana Buddhism influenced the people of these countries in almost every fields of life such as religion, politics, economics, sociology, psychology and culture. It has been rightly pointed out by Edward Conze that the two most noteworthy contributions of the Mahayana doctrine are the creation of the Bodhisattva ideal and the elaboration of the doctrine of Emptiness.
According to Har Dayal, the Bodhisattva doctrine originated probably in the 2nd century B.C. He says,” We may regard the second century B.C. as the chronological starting point for the development of the Bodhisattva.” According to N. Dutta it was around 2nd or 1st century B.C.[1]
Most religions teach us that the communication between the followers and God or Creator is based on an absolute belief in Him. If they have God’s favour they will find luck and happiness in the present and future. But the Buddha differed from this view. He is with the opinion that morality, concentration and purification of mind are necessary for ultimate liberation. The Buddha also exhorted people to stay away from evil not because of the fear of punishment from God but from a sincere wish for the welfare of all beings. He urged people to cultivate good qualities and develop the powers inherent within us with self confidence.
Santideva was a famous Buddhist philosopher saint. Though his life cannot be actually dated from references to him as found in historically datable sources we can infer that he lived in India during the last part of the seventh century and the first part of the eighth century. He followed the Mahayana tradition and has attained everlasting fame by composing Bodhicharayavatara and the Siksasamuccaya. These two books as a whole give a splendid account of Indian Mahayana thought on the theory and conduct of a Bodhisattva. The name of Santideva is associated above all with two extant texts the Bodhicaryavatara and the Sikshasamuchaya.
The Bodhicaryavatara (Introduction to the conduct of a Bodhisattva) in its most widely known form is a work of just over 900 verses[2]. Tibetan legends suggest that the text was originally recited orally, as do the texts own literary features. Although it has been translated into Tibetan multiple times and revered throughout Tibetan Buddhist tradition, it was composed and redacted in Sanskrit. Its Sanskrit is relatively close to Paninian Standards of grammar, with a Buddhist vocabulary. It is appreciated widely both for literary beauty and profound thought. Its ten chapters lead their reader through the path of being a Bodhisattva- a future Buddha and therefore a being on the way to perfection, according to the Mahayana tradition. It begins with praise for Bodhicitta, the state of mind that makes one an aspiring Bodhisattva and ends with a ritual direction (parinamana) of good karma, by which the Bodhisattva attempts to benefit those around him. The chapters in between deal with various topics, but they focus especially on developing the six perfections of virtue of a Bodhisattva: giving or generosity (dana), properly restrained conduct (sila), patient endurance (ksanti), heroic strength (virya), meditative concentration (dhyana) and metaphysical insight (Prajna). The last four receive their own chapter in the end. According to Michael Sweet (1996, 245) it is ‘the most important source for the entire Tibetan literary genre of blo sbyong (mental purification) and according to (Williams, 1995), the present Dalai Lama it is the highest inspiration for his ideals and practices. Tibetan commentators have written many commentaries on the text over the years and several of these are now available in English translation.
Santideva’s degree of influence is much harder to ascertain, given the lack of historical evidence. The Bodhicaryavatara especially the ninth chapter is quoted in an anthology called the Subhasitasamgraha.
The Indian reception of Santideva is most significant because it included Prajnakarmati’s commentary on the Bodhicaryavatara which was highly influenced for the Tibetans who followed and which (as mentioned) quotes heavily from the Sikshasamuchaya (Crosby and Skilton 1995).
The Bodhicaryavatara has also been widely translated, studied and admired in the West. Luiz Gomez (1999, 262-263) even suggests that it is now the third most frequently translated text of Indian Buddhism (the first two being Dhammapada and Heart Sutra). In a recent introductory text we find that the Bodhicaryavatara has been treated as one of the classic readings in ethics like Plato’s Gorgias and Mill’s Utilitarianism.
Bodhisattva provides the central theme for the Bodhicaryavatara. The literal meaning of the word Bodhisattva is a being trying to reach the final goal of Bodhi (awakening or enlightenment) by which one becomes a Buddha (literally Awakened One). The root for both the words Bodhi and Buddha is budh or awaken. The title Bodhicharyavatara is the short form of Bodhisattvacharyavatara or introduction to the conduct of a Bodhisattva. The text is often referred to by Tibetan commentaries and histories by its latter name. Introduction to the conduct of a Bodhisattva fairly summarizes the subject matter of the text. The term prthajana is introduced by Santideva to describe non Bodhisattvas or the common man. Due to the influence of Bodhicaryavatara the figure of Santideva has assumed a great influence in the history of Buddhism.          
Santideava was a great scholar and poet. Before composing the Bodhicaryavatara, he probably had composed Siksasamuccaya which summarized over 100 sutras to explain key moral concepts and the nature of the Bodhisattva path. The Bodhicharyavatara was a lyrical poem of 1000 lines that is frequently regarded as the single best summary of the theory and practice of Mahayana philosophy. However the exact number of works composed by him is unknown to us. Bodhicharyavatara is the essence of entire Mahayana literature which illustrates the poetic, philosophic spiritual and religious sides of Santideva. We know from Bu-ston’s book ‘History of Buddhism in India and Tibet’ that there were nearly 100 commentaries on Bodhicharyavatara in India and but we have Tibetan versions only for eight of them. His Highness Dalai Lama also frequently uses quotations from the Bodhicharyavatara in his speech.  . Even today the Bodhicharyavatara is studied by people with great enthusiasm in the Buddhist countries.
Santideva’s Bodhicharyavatara is divided into ten chapters and they contain over nine hundred stanzas in Sanskrit3. A commentary of the Bodhicharyavatara up to stanza 9 was composed by Prajnakarmati (P.M.) and the work came to be known as Panjika. 
In all probability, Santideva was a student of Jayadeva who succeeded Dharmapala at Nalanda University. He was a follower of Prasangika system of Madhyamika philosophy Madhyamaka. The Bodhicharyavatara composed by him is world classic.    He was the son of King Kalyanavarman who ruled in Saurastra in South India. It is believed that in his previous lives he met the Buddha and established in himself the root of liberation. When he was young he studied sciences and martial arts. He respected his teachers very much and was greatly compassionate to suffering people. When he grew up he was chosen as the heir to the throne. On the night before his enthronement, he dreamt of Manjusri sitting on the throne and telling him not to sit on the throne as it was his seat. And as advised by his mother he left the palace and went to the forest of Banga. After arriving at Banga, Santideva met a girl who saved him from drinking poisoned water and sent him to his teacher who was a great lama. From him he received initiation and instructions on meditation. After twelve years of practice he attained pure vision that enabled him to perceive Manjushree and then as advised by his preceptor he went the city to preach what he had learnt. Santideva became an assistant to the king. When dissatisfied subjects threatened the king he came to his aid and the king was converted to Buddhism. When the Vedic master Sankarananda challenged Buddhists, Santideva was chosen to represent them and he won the debate. For this reason Buddhism flourished.
 After his arrival at Nalanda, Santideva received ordination from Jinadeva. There he received the title Santideva or the ‘god of peace’. By practising Samadhi he had gained limitless mental power. He studied the Tripitaka and composed three major texts such as ‘Compendium of All Precepts’, ‘Compendium of All Sutras” and ‘Engaging in the Conduct of the Bodhisattvas’. Ordinary people thought that he was only eating, sleeping and walking. So he earned the nickname Busuku. The monks attempted to force him out of the monastery and made him recite and give a public lecture. Santideva mounted the large throne that was built by them. Everyone proclaimed him as a noble being of great intelligence.
His great teachings were written down by the hearers at Nalanda. As it had three versions, a delegation was sent to Sridaksina in the south where he lived to determine which one was correct. There Santideva said that the text with 1000 verses was the authentic one.  
In the west of Magadha, Santideva met 500 Pasandakas who were desperate to have food due to famine. It is said that he fed all of them with one bowl of rice and converted them to Buddhism. Then he fed thousands of beggars during a famine and gave   them happiness by teaching the Dhamma.
We find in the Encyclopaedia of Religion1that The Sanskrit term Bodhisattvacarya means Bodhisattva path. There are two ways for the Bodhisattvas to cultivate Dhamma namely, through belief and understanding of the twelve causes and conditions, the middle way, or through belief and understanding of the six Perfections or Paramitas.
The Bodhisattva path begins with obeisance and worship of the Buddha, Dhamma and Sangha. The confession of sins to the Buddhas and the Bodhisattvas is also required. After confessing his sins the Bodhisattva seeks help and protection from them. In Mahayana confession is the means for absolving sins and the confessor entreats the Buddhas to cleanse them with the water of mercy. According to Tibetan and Indian cultural tradition there are three qualities of an enlightened being and nine characteristics of noble ones. These three qualities are wisdom, compassion and spiritual power. These qualities gradually develop in the Bodhisattva path and ultimately in attaining Buddhahood. According to the Mahayana Buddhist doctrine the nine characteristics of the noble one are the following: study, contemplation, meditation, teaching, debate, composition, learning purity, and nobility. The first three qualities belong to the foundational level; the second three qualities are teaching, debate and composition. This represents the path level. The final level is the result which is learning, purity and nobility. In the Tibetan ‘Rnam Thar’4 the life story of Santideva is recounted in such a way that each of these nine qualities becomes evident. There we find a clear description of the preliminary stages of study, contemplation and meditation.
 In Sanskrit Buddhist literature confession of sin is known as papadesana and this was said to be as one of the necessary preconditions for the awakening of the thought of Enlightenment. Though at this point of time the spiritual faculty of the would be Bodhisattva in not yet purified and developed up to the standard required for the aspiration and do not result in the thought of Enlightenment, they are fully ripe for the attainment of the status of Bodhisattva. According to Mati Panchen, the Bodhisattva should,” …adopt the four white Dhammas. They are, do not speak lies even at the cost of one’s own life, regard all Bodhisattvas as spiritual masters, generate benevolent towards all sentient beings, and place other beings in the path of the Mahayana. At the same time, the Bodhisattva has to relinquish the following black Dhammas, such as deceiving one’s lama and those worthy of respect, causing others to regret that which is not regrettable, angrily criticizing Bodhisattvas, and adopting cunning and deception to others. Mati Panchen also says that in case of declining enlightenment the following steps should be taken. If enlightenment thought declines due to giving up the wish to attain enlightenment it should be restored by performing the rituals again and carefully guarding the thoughts of enlightenment.
After the demise of the Buddha, Hinayana and Mahayana developed from early Buddhism. Hinayana was the conservative of the two which tried to retain the orthodox teachings and practices in their pure forms. According to it there is only one Buddha who is the historical founder of Buddhism and the highest aim of one’s life is to attain Arahanthood that is to become a good disciple of the Budddha through one’s own effort. The Hinayanists believe that the Pali canons are the main scriptures. Mahayana Buddhism is a later development of Buddhism which gives a new interpretation of the teachings of the Buddha. According to Mahayana teachings Pali canons are not the only scriptural source, Buddhism has many new scriptures written in Sanskrit, Chinese and Tibetan etc. They also believe that there was not only one Buddha but many. The main purpose of life is not merely to attain salvation for oneself but to help others to attain salvation.   
Though the Buddha expressed his religious doctrine in terms of Dependent Origination or and Middle Path, several centuries later a group of Mahayana texts such as the Vajrachedika Prajnaparamita Sutra and the Hridaya Sutra very forcefully expressed the doctrine of sunyata or emptiness. .The Hridaya Sutra is often bound up with the Vajracchedika Sutra and it rivals its companion in popularity. But they are so closely allied both internally and externally that the question of rivalry does not arise at all. The Hridaya Sutra has two recensions, along and a short one. In the longer recension in the beginning and end we find an account of the circumstances of its preaching. In this Sutra we find a dialogue between Bodhisattva Avolokiteshvara and Sariputra, the great disciple of the Buddha though only the Bodhisattva actually speaks.  
It is relevant to compare and contrast Santidev’s Bodhicharyavatara with Chandrakirti’s Madhyamakavaatara (MA). A great amount of insight can be obtained about the doctrine of sunyata or emptiness and about the Bodhisattvapath if these two texts are read side by side. In Chandrakirti we find a simpler introduction but Santideva delves deeper into the issue. In both these works we find a refutation of the arguments put forward by the opposing philosophical schools. The MA and the Bodhicharyavatara illuminate one another and there is a similarity between their knowledge base. Both Santideva and Chandrakirti use Madhyamika philosophy to explain the path of Bodhisattva and the nature of reality. But the difference is that while Chandrakirt discusses the issue in the light of the Ten Bhumis, Santideva does the same in the light of the Six Paramitas. But both of them believe that the Bodhisattva Path has its beginning in the development of enlightenment thought. It means the desire for enlightenment with a benevolent heart or in other words with the desire to serve every sentient being. After enlightenment though is generated the Bodhisattva begins his journey with the help of practising the Six Paramitas or Perfections namely giving, morality, patience, diligence, meditation and wisdom. By way of practicing the Paramitas one attains the stages named Ten Bhumis that supply Chandrakirti with the framework for discussing the Bodhisattva Path. The Bhumis are known as Extreme Joy, Stainlessness, Producing Light, Radiating Light, Difficult to Exorcise, Manifesting, Gone Far, Immovable, Exalted  Intellect and Cloud of Dhamma. By practising each of these Paramitas Bodhisattva comes closer to the attainment of ultimate knowledge. Both Santideva and Chandrakirti believe that an understanding of emptiness is needed to be able to gain complete enlightenment.5
By emptiness we mean that all persons and phenomena do not have an inherent existence. It is essential to understand and experience emptiness if one wishes to attain complete enlightenment. After the dedication we find in the Bodhicharyavatara an exhaustive discussion on enlightenment thought that is also known as bodhichitta. Santideva frames his entire text on the generation and application of enlightenment thought. He devotes the first three chapters of Bodhicharyavatara for the discussion of the motivation of enlightenment thought, and discusses the application of this thought in chapters 4 to 9. For Santideva there are two types of Enlightened Thought namely relative and ultimate. Relative Enlightenment thought can be further divided into two types, e.g. wishing and entering:6
“In summary this Enlightenment thought
Should be understood of two types:
The mind that wishes to become enlightened
And the mind that actually engages in Enlightenment.”
 (Bodhicaryavatara, 5, 1.15)

Enlightenment is attained not for narrow selfish gain but for the benefit of all sentient beings. The undertaking of Bodhisattva path means entering enlightenment thought. It is the experimental understanding of emptiness and this brings happiness to oneself and others by dispelling sins and makes one a Bodhisattva.
The engagement on the Bodhisattva path formally starts with taking of the Bodhisattva vow that generates enlightenment thought and commits one to enter enlightenment thought until that is achieved. When one takes the oath of helping other beings there is a greater chance that one would follow the path with perseverance. According to Santideva, Bodhisattva vow is the official generation of Bodhichitta.
   The Six Perfections are the means that describe the method with the help of which one engages the Bodhisattva Path. In Sanskrit Perfection means Paramitas and in Tibetan they are called ‘Paroduchinba.” The Sanskrit and the Tibetan words both mean ‘gone to the other shore.” With the help of the six Perfections one we cross the sea of samsara and attain the shore of nirvana. The Six Perfections are the following Giving, Morality, Patience, Diligence, Meditation, and Wisdom. 
The perfection of each individual Paramita can be achieved. A Perfected Paramita has the following characteristics:
1.      Enlightened thought is its motivation.
2.       It is vast because its aim is to help all sentient beings.
3.      It is the source of happiness to people.
4.      It has wisdom that goes beyond the range of subject, object and action.
5.       Its aim is great enlightenment.
6.      It is free from the great obstructions of defilement and cognition.
Now we will discuss the Six Paramitas in detail. It is important to note that each perfection has both a definition and an opposite.
Giving:
Instead of devoting an entire chapter to the Paramita of Giving Santideva addresses this throughout the Bodhicaryavatara. The opposite of Giving or dana is stinginess. Giving or offering can be of three types: mental offerings, offering of one’s own body and Dharma teachings. As the giving of material objects is likely to become perverted by defilements like greed mental offerings are considered to be superior to material offerings.
Morality:
According to Santideva morality is of three types: the cessation of all non virtues, performance of the ten virtues, and working for the benefits of all sentient beings. Santideva discusses the Perfection of morality in two chapters namely in chapters 4 and 5.  Chapter 4 is about heedfulness that means always holding the Bodhisattva precepts in one’s mind. Chapter 5 deals with guarding alertness. This involves the performance of the ten virtues such as stopping killing, stopping stealing, stopping sexual misconduct, stopping lying, stopping slander, stopping harsh words, stopping idle talk, and stopping wrong views. According to Santideva guarding alertness helps one in dispelling fear and in becoming free from the heels of the mind.
Patience:
The sixth chapter of Bodhicaryavatara deals with the Perfection of Patience. Santideva considers Patience as the greatest of all virtues and this helps us to retain our mental composure under extreme provocation.  Patience is of three types namely disregarding harm, accepting suffering voluntarily, the thinking of the certainty of the Dharma. Anger is the opposite of Patience and in order to eradicate anger patience has to be perfected.
Diligence:
The Perfection of Diligence has been dealt with in the seventh chapter of the Bodhicaryavatara. A truly diligent person does not get tired on his way to enlightenment and feels happy in maintaining the Bodhisattva precepts. Laziness or not striving for enlightenment is the opposite of diligence.
Meditation:
 The Perfection of Mediation has been discussed in chapter 7 of Bodhicaryavatara along with the Perfection of Meditation. Meditation directs our consciousness inwardly and according to Santideva its purpose is to get rid of mental defilements and obstructions. Distraction is the opposite of Meditation.
Wisdom:
The ninth chapter of the Bodhicaryavatara discusses Wisdom. This is the longest chapter of the book since it discusses the ultimate nature of reality. According to the Buddha in order to apprehend the nature of reality the perfection of wisdom has to be attained. Madhyamika philosophy tells us that since all things are interdependent they are devoid of any intrinsic existence.
The title of the ninth chapter of Bodhicaryavatara is “The Perfection of Wisdom.” In this chapter Santideva deals with emptiness for the development of wisdom. Here Santideva establishes his view by refuting those of the non Buddhists as well as those of the Sautantrika, Vaibhasika and the Mind only Buddhist Schools. At the outset Santideva supplies the reasons for developing wisdom. Santideva says that the ability to understand emptiness is synonymous with wisdom. It means the understanding which helps us to realize that all persons and phenomena do not have any inherent self. According to Madhyamika philosophy anything must satisfy three requirements in order to qualify as having inherent existence. Firstly, it must have independence, secondly it must have substance (or material), and finally it must have changelessness or permanence.
According to Santideva there are two levels of truth and they are relative truth and ultimate truth. The relative level of truth concerns the observable and mundane world of visible people and objects. The ultimate level of truth, on the other hand, is beyond
the level of intellect but can be directly experienced by means of meditation. In order to become fully enlightened we have to realize first that all phenomena are empty or without selfhood. The awareness of emptiness gives us freedom from all material desires and clinging. Santideva also says that we should study emptiness urgently and out of compassion for all sentient beings.

Notes and References:

 [1]. Dutta, N, Mahayana Buddhism, Sri Satguru Publication, New Delhi, 1978, p.1. see also, Bhikkhuni Gioi Hiong, Bodhisattva and Sunyata, Eastern Book Linkers, New Delhi,2005, p. 125.
2. C. Upender Rao, chodrungma Kunga Chodron, Michelle L.Dexter, Sanntideva and Bodhicaryavatara, Eastern Book Linkers, New Delhi,2005, p.53.
3. The text of Bo. Was first published in the Russian oriental journal Japiski, IV, 1889 by Minayef, by which scholars came to know about the greatness of this text and gradually Bo. Was translated into other European languages. L.D. Barnett ha translated into English in 1909 then it was translated into French twice from Paris; first by Poussin in 1912 and then by Lo Finot in 1920. R. Schmidts german translation appeared im 1923 from Paderbom, In Italian it was translated by G. Tucci and the same was published in 1925 from Torino. Sri Dharmananda Kosambi an Indian scholar of Buddhist studies has translated in into Gujrati and Marathi. Ibid.
4. A commentary on Santideva’s Engaging in the conduct of the Bodhisattvas Written by Sazang Mati Panchen known as An Extremely Clear Illumination of the Meaning of the Text. Translated from the Tibetan by Venarable Lama Kalsang Gyaltsen and Chodrung –ma-Kunga Chodron. Tsechen Kunchab Ling Publications, Walden NY, 2006, see also Ibid., p. 20. 
5. C. Upender Rao, chodrungma Kunga Chodron, Michelle L.Dexter, Sanntideva and    Bodhicaryavatara, Eastern Book Linkers, New Delhi,2005, p.152.
6. C. Upender Rao, chodrungma Kunga Chodron, Michelle L.Dexter, Sanntideva and Bodhicaryavatara, Eastern Book Linkers, New Delhi,2005, p.153.

Bibliography:

1.      Albany; Francis Brassard, The Concept of Bodhicitta in Santideva's  Bodhicaryāvatāra, McGill University, 1997.
2.      Bhikkhuni Gioi Huong, Bodhisattva and Sunyata, Eastern Book Linkers, New
 Delhi, 2005.
3.    Banerji, R. D., The Origin of the Bengali Script, University of Calcutta, Calcutta, 1919.
4.    Barnett, L. D., The path of light: Rendered from the `Bodhi-charyāvatāra' of  Śānti-deva:
       A manual of Mahāyāna Buddhism, Wisdom of the East Series, John Murray, London.
       1947.
5.   Batchelor, Stephen, A Guide to the Bodhisattva's Way of Life, Library of Tibetan 
      Works and Archives, Dharamsala. 1979.
6.   Bhaṭṭācārya, Vidhuśekhara, Bodhicaryāvatāra, vol. 1580 of Bibliotheca Indica, The 
      Asiatic Society, Calcutta. 1960.
7.      Brassard, Francis, The Concept of Bodhicitta in Śāntideva’s Bodhicaryāvatāra, State University of New York Press, 2000.
8.      Brunhölzl, Karl, The Center of the Sunlit Sky: Madhyamaka in the Kagyü Tradition, including a translation of Pawo Rinpoche's commentary on the knowledge section of Śāntideva's The entrance to the Bodhisattva's way of life (Bodhicaryāvatāra), Snow Lion Publications, Ithaca. 2004.
9.   C. Upendar Rao, Chordung-ma Kunga Chordon and Michelle L. Dexter, (Ed.), Santideva
       and Bodhicharyavatara, Eastern Book Linkers, New Delhi,2005.
9.      Chimpa, Lama and Alaka Chattopadhyaya, Tāranātha’s History of Buddhism in India,   
Motilal Banarsidass Publishers Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi. 1997.
10.  Chodron, Pema, No Time to Lose: A Timely Guide to the Way of the Bodhisattva,
 Shambhala Publications, Boston. 2005.
11.  Crosby, Kate and Andrew Skilton, The Bodhicaryāvatāra, Oxford University Press,
 Oxford. 1996.
12.   Divyavajra, V., Ācārya Śāntidevayā Bodhicaryāvatāra: Prajñākaramatiyāgu
        Pañjikā sahita. Bhāṣāhīkūma Divyavajra Vajrācārya, Newari translation of the BCA,
         Bodhi Prakāśana Kendra, Yala (Lalitapura), Nepal. 1986.
13.   Hara Prasad Śāstri, A Descriptive Catalogue of Sanscrit Manuscripts in the
        Government collection under the care of The Asiatic Society of Bengal, Baptist Mission   
        Press, Calcutta. 1917.
14.  Matics, Marion Leonidas., Entering the Path of Enlightenment: The
      Bodhicaryāvatāra of the Buddhist poet Śāntideva, Allen & Unwin, London, 1971, (from  
       Ph.D.Thesis, Columbia University, 1960).
15.  Matsunami, S., A Catalogue of the Sanskrit Manuscripts in the Tokyo University
      Libary (Toky-o Daigaku Toshokan shozo Bonbun shahon mokuroku), Suzuki Research
      Foundation, Tokyo. 1965.
16.  Melis, Nicole Martínez., “The Bodhicaryavatara: A Buddhist treatise translated
        Into Western languages”, in Branchadell et al., Less Translated Languages, John
        Benjamins, Amsterdam-Philadelphia, 2005.
17.  Mitra, Rājendralāla., The Sanskrit Buddhist Literature of Nepal, Sanskrit
       Pustak Bhandar, Calcutta. 1971.
18.  Mukhopādhyāya., Bodhicaryāvatāra, Bengali translation of BCA, Śāntiketan. 1962.
19.  Sangharakshita, Bhikshu., The endlessly fascinating cry: an exploration of the
       Bodhicaryāvatāra, Shambhala, Berkeley. 1978.
20.  Śāstri, Śānti Bhikṣu., Acarya Santideva ka Bodhicaryavatara. Anuvadaka
       Santibhikshusastri, Buddhavihara, Lakhanau (Luknow). 1955.
21.  Sharma, Parmananda., Śāntideva Bodhicaryāvatāra: Original Sanskrit Text with
       English Translation and Exposition Based on Prajkaramati's Pañjikā, Aditya Prakashan,
       New Delhi. 1990.
22.  Shastri, Dwarika Das., Bodhicaryāvatāra of Ārya Śāntideva with the Commentary
       Pañjikā of Shri Prajñākaramati & Hindi Translation, Bauddha Bharati, Varanasi. 1988.
23.  Shastri, Yajneshwar Sadashiv., Acarya Santideva ka Bodhicaryavatara. Anuvadaka
       Santibhikshusastri, Hindi translation of BCA, Buddhavihara, Luknow. 1955.
24.   Williams, Paul, Studies in the Philosophy of the Bodhicaryavatara Altruism and reality,
        Motilal Banarsidass Publishers Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi, 2000.






Thursday, December 8, 2016

Social Cultural and Educational history of Ladakh



    

Sumanapal Bhikkhu


Ladakh, which is situated in the Himalayas on the borders of Tibet, Sinkiang and Kashmir, is a remote land. The territory of Ladakh is one of the most elevated regions in the Trance Himalayan region. ‘La’ means mountain passes and ‘Dak’ indicates country. So the word Ladakh means ‘country of the mountain passes’. Ladakh is the remotest, highest and largest district of Jammu and Kashmir state. A Ladakhi saying is “The land is so barren and the passes so high that only the best friends or fiercest enemies would want to visit us. Ladakh is said to be one of the last living jewels of the ancient and previous Tibetan cultural heritage”.

Buddhism is the prevailing religion of Ladakh. During 241 B.C. Asoka the Great, the famous Maurya ruler Thera Majjantiko was sent to Kashmir and Afghanistan in order to propagate the religion of the Buddha. In 400 A. D. the great Chinese traveller Fa-hien found Buddhism in a very flourishing condition in Ladakh. In those days the Buddhists of Ladakh used to carry the prayer cylinders with them and such cylinders can be found even today in the hands of many lamas and Ladakhis. In the 2nd century A. D. The famous Kusana King Kanishka ruled over some portions of lower Ladakh and Zauskar. He was a devout Buddhist and during his rule Buddhism flourished in this area.

For many centuries there were trade relations between Khatan, Yarkhand and Ladakh. Fa-hien entered Ladakh or its north – west in about 400 A. D.. His objective was to secure authentic copies of the Vinaya Pitaka. He came to Ladakh from Khatan. At that time a meeting was arranged by the ruler of the place. On such occasions the sramanas from all quarters were invited by the king.

In Ladakh Fa-hien came across two relics of the Buddha namely his tooth and his arms bowl. A stupa over the tooth relic was made by the people. According to Fa-hien there were more than a thousand monks and their disciples in Ladakh and all of them followed the Himayana.

But very little is known about the condition of Buddhism before the 8th century A. D.. From the 6th century onwards Ladakh was ruled by Tibeton Kings. Lalitaditya, the king of Kashmir suppressed and defeated the Tibetans and made Ladakh a part of his kingdom. But he could not stay in Ladak due to its adverse geographical conditions. As a result of this Ladakh could retain its independence for a brief period of time.

When in the year 822 A. D. The Tibetan King Lang Darma was killed, the two princes Tashi Tsegspal and Skyid – 1 De-Nyima-Gon left Tibet. Later it was Tashi Tsegepal who established the first dynasty of Ladakh. His kingdom extended upto Baltistan and Lahul – Spiti was included within it. Perhaps during the same period Skyid – 1 De-Nyima-Gon together with the Mongols established himself on the upper portion of Ladakh. Under the patronage of the Mongols Mahayana Buddhism arrived in Ladakh from Tibet. This form of Buddhism was patronized by the Ladakhi Kings and it flourished here. From the twelfth century onwards Tibet established itself as the spiritual and cultural guide of Ladakh. The role of Tibet became so important in the cultural and religious fields of Ladakh that it came to be known as ‘Indian Tibet’ or ‘Little Tibet’. Ladakh is a repository of Tibetan religious practice and culture. Towards the end of the Tenth century A.D. many people from Tibet began to settle in Ladakh and in the process they played a very remarkable role in the lives of the people of Ladakh.

Islam was introduced in Ladakh by the Muslim ruler of Kashmir during the 14th century A.D.. Under their patronage Islam began to flourish in Ladakh. They sent many expeditions to the region. Sultan Sahibab – ud –din (1350 A.D. – 1375 A. D.) of Shah Miri Dynasty captured Ladakh and Baltistan and added these regions in his Kingdom. Zaimul – Abidin of Kashmir attacked Ladakh in 1451 A. D. And 1470 A.D. Mirza Haider dughlta was sent with an army by Sultan Sayed of Kashmir in order to attack Ladakh from the north in the year 1532. The citizens of Ladakh were forced to accept Islam. The temples and monsasteries were burnt, the images of Buddha were destroyed. The Mongels also had a great contribution in popularizing Islam in Ladakh. The king Jamyang Namgyal was compelled to introduce Islam in Ladakh. Then many Muslim Baltis came and settled in the region.

King Jamyang Namgyal married one of the daughters of Ali Mir. In an attempt to atone for the description of the gompas by the Baltis he restored some of the temples and images of the Buddha. He also received some copies of the sacred books from Tibet.

The next ruler Singye Namgyal (1610 – 1645) was a devout Buddhist though his mother was a Muslim. He was a strong ruler who defeated Ahmed Khan the chief of Balti when the latter tried to attack Ladakh with the help of the Mughal Emperor Jahangir. He had a long reign which began from 1620 and lasted until 1670. He restored many Buddhist images and shrines. A nine storied high palace in Leh was built by him.

Singge Namgyal was succeeded by his son Deldan Namgyal. He was also a devout Buddhist like his father. He constructed several Buddhist temples and two sacred images of Chamba and Chanrazik that corresponded to Maitreya and Analokiteswara respectively. He also appointed several priests for their daily worship. Deldan defeated the chiefs of Karchu and Balti and made them tributary of Ladakh.

Deldan’s son Delak ws the ruler from 1705 A. D. to 1740 A. D. Tsepal Namgyal (C 1790 – 1834, 1840 – 42) was the last independent ruler of Ladakh. Being a weak ruler he failed to maintain the sovereignty and integrity of Ladakh. He was very much disturbed by the invasion of the enemies. Besides, he was not an able administrator also. At that time a new power appeared in Ladakh. Kashmir was occupied by the famous Sikh ruler Maharaja Ranjit Singh. He appointed Gulab Singh, a Dogras as the Governor of Jammu. He made a plan to invade Ladakh. He had two ambitions in mind – first, he wanted to control the Pashmina trade in Ladakh and to encircle the Kashmir valley. But before embarking on his proposed invasion he received the green signal of the British Government.

The force of Gulab singh was led by his brave and able Governor Wazir Zorawar Singh. The force was compassed of soldiers drawn from Kishtwar, Jammu and other surrounding areas. Some of the soldiers professed the Muslim faith. They were better trained that the Ladakhi soldiers and also possessed superior weapons. The Ladakhis were defeated in the battle and a settlement was reached by which the Kind of Ladakh agreed to pay annual tribute as well as was indemnity to the King of Kashmir. But the Wazir left Leh without building a fort or stationing any troops there. This encouraged the Ladahis to stop the payment annual tribute and harass Munshi Daya Ram the representative of Gulab Singh at Leh.

When the news of these developments reached the Wazir he again attacked Leh via Zanskar which was a direct but difficult route. He made a sudden and dramatic appearance and the Ladakhis were not at all prepared for the invasion. They requested British for assistance but it was turned down. The Ladakhi King was deposed and Marup Stanzin of Leh, a relative of the deposed king was selected as the titular head of Ladakh.  This signified the end of the royal dynasty of independent Ladakh. It was decided that the new ruler would pay a sum of Rs.18000/- as annual tribute. As a precautionary step to check the new ruler’s conduct his son was taken as hostage by the Wazir. A delegation with a tribute of Rs.50000/- was also sent to Ranjit Singh and by this the Dogra conquest of Ladakh was officially recognized by the new ruler.

In 1846 the British defeated the Sikhs in a war in which Gulab Singh did not help the latter. As a result, the British made him the ruler of the newly created state of Jammu and Kashmir as a reward. From that time the ruler of Ladakh became a vassal king under the Maharaja of Kashmir. For the next hundred years Ladakh remained under the Dogra rule. In 1947, at the time of the independence of India the Maharaja of Kashmir decided to join the Indian Union. By this decision Ladakh’s political future became closely ‘linked to Indian’s.

The Dogra rule of Ladakh which lasted about a century was by and large sympathetic though the administrative officials were engaged in oppression and exploitation to some extent. The Dogras did not interfere in the religious life of the people which used to be controlled by the directions of Lhasa. The Dogras created the past of administrative head known as ‘Thanedar’ who enjoyed both civil and military powers.

The first Thanedar of Ladakh was Magna Thanedar who took steps for the rehabilitation of Ladakhi people. He built a fort and an impressing building at Leh and a garden at the outskirts of the town. The next Thanedar Mehta Basti Ram established goat and sheep farms and as a result the revenue of the State increased. He built the present bazaar of Leh. The third, Thanedar of Ladakh Mehta Mangal was the most popular and outstanding among the Thanedars. His must noteworthy contribution was in the field of land revenue collation system. He renovated and improved the old fort built by Magna Thanedar and improved its security by building a high strong wall and a ditch around it. He set up new settlements for landless and homeless people and supplied them with agricultural seeds and implements and exempted them from land revenue for some time.

During the early years of Dogra rule in Ladakh, Baltistan was also governed by military commanders. While in those days Ladakh comprised a separate political unity the territories of Skardu and Kargil formed a distinctly separate political unit. When Ladakh and Gilgit were later on separated administratively, the Tehsils of Skardu and Kargil continued as parts of the district of Baltistan. Subsequently, the whole of Ladakh and Baltistan existed as a single district under one Wazir with summer and winter headquarters at Leh and Skardu respectively. Winter headquarters at Leh and Skardu respectively. This arrangement continued till Pakistan raided the state in 1947 and grabbed a part of its territory despite Maharaja Hari Singh’s accession to India on October 27, 1947. The Ladhakis due to their religious and cultural ties with India decided to continue to stay as a part of the state in the larger interests of India and their own.

In July 1949, the Indian Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru himself visited Ladakh accompanied by Sheikh Mohammed Abdullah, the then chief Minister of Kashmir. Pandit Nehru said on July 7, ‘Ladakh is no longer far away we are all children of India and we shall face all our problems together’? He further said, ‘Buddhism is the prevailing religion here and so Buddhist religion and learning must be encouraged and helped. You know that Buddhism came from India; rest assured that Buddhism and Buddhist institutions here will receive every possible opportunity for development. It has long been my cherished desire that we should study your ancient manuscripts and other works with the help of your wise and learned men to our and to your advantage.’

Despite the assurances given by Pandit Nehru, the indifferent attitude of the State Government of Jammu and Kashmir created a great problem for the people of Ladakh. A number of delegations were sent to the Central Government to redress their grievance. Some of these delegations were led by Kushok Bakula Rinpoche, the head monk of Ladakh. The Rinpoche played an important role in the building of modern Ladakh. He was elected as a Minister of State in the Government of Jammu and Kashmir. In a devastating speech on May 20, 1952, Kushok Bakula exposed the apathetic and negative attitude of the state Government towards Ladakh. He criticized the Budget speech of the Government and said, ‘read the statement from one end to the other, you will not find Ladakh mentioned even once much less will you find a reference to its economic and other needs which are urgent and pressing and by for urgent attention and fulfilment.’

The appointment of Bakshi Ghulam Mohammad as the successor of Sheikh Abdullah as the Chief Minister of Kashmir was welcomed by the Ladakhis. The new chief Minister took some positive steps about Ladakh and inducted Kushok Bakula as Deputy Minister In-charge of Ladakh affairs into his Council of Ministers. But the portfolio did not clearly define the dimensions of functions of the Minister. So Kushok Bakula met the Chief Minister and sought clarification from him. But in response he got evasive reply and what was more he was blatantly denied of his prerogative in a democratic set up. Afterwards, Kushok Bakula directly discussed the pressing problems of Ladakh with the Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru.

Bakshi Ghulam Mohammad was succeeded by Shams-ud-Din who did not last long and the next Prime Minister of Jammu and Kashmir was G. M. Sadiq. As the Government was disturbed by the situation in Ladakh it decided to introduce there and administrative set up based on the Philosophy and experience of North East Frontier Agency (NEFA). It meant the posting of the Indian Administrative Service Personnel to the region increase administrative agency and curb corruption Pandit Nehru himself was in favour of this step but it met with stern opposition from the state Government. The state Government has adopted a divided and rule policy in an attempt to create a friction in the Buddhist Community in Ladakh. It tried to do away with the influence of the lamas and to give the leadership to the younger generation. As a result there was a bitter clash between orthodox and modernity and between spiritual and temporal elements. The situation was very disturbing for the peace having citizens of Ladakh and that ultimately led to the people’s demand of Union Territory status.

The successive State Government of Jammu and Kashmir made the error of taking Ladakhis for granted and the dissatisfaction of them finally resulted in the infamous communal riot in Ladakh which paved the way for the formation of Hill Council in the region in the year 1993.

The people of Ladakh profess three religions namely Islam, Buddhism and Christianity. The Leh district is predominantly Buddhist and the Kargil district is predominantly Muslim. The third constituent of the population namely the Christians account for some of the elites of the Ladakhi population because of their education and social standing.

There is a visible Tibetan contribution on the delicate cultural music of Ladakh comprising its rich art, architecture, painting, sculpture, language, etc. Until 1962, Ladakh was completely dependent on Tibet in its cultural and religious affairs. As a result of this a dialect of Western Tibet became the language of Ladakh. The close religious and cultural this between Tibet and Ladakh suffered drastically in the wake of 1962 Sino-Indian war. The closure of India’s border with Tibet resulted in the end of the centuries – old system of contacts between the gompas of Tibet and Ladakh. But even now this Holiness the Dalai Lama continues to be the spiritual leader of the Ladakhis. There was a time when crime was unheard of in Ladakh and even today there is virtually no crime and usual disputes are rare.  However, the impact of consumerism is penetrating in the society of Ladakah. Concern and sympathy for relatives and neighbours is rapidly dwindling and a wealthy person has become the centre of attraction. The interaction of te youth with the foreign tourists is generating in them a new vision and dream. In this way the life and culture of the people of Ladakh is being influenced by modernisation. But fortunately, many youngsters in the Ladakhi Society feel concerned about the deterioration in social behaviour and the need for taking remedial steps. The most effective measure is to understand the true nature of the society and civilization in Ladakh and once this is achieved the rest will take care of itself. Therefore, we should keep faith on the new generation of Ladakh and hope that they will be able to find a balance between tradition and modernism.



Bibliography:

1.      Das, Narendra Kumar, (Ed.), Tibetan Studies Past and Present, Kaveri Books, New Delhi, 2000.
2.      Das, Sarat Chandra, Edited By., Alaka Chattopadhyaya, Tibetan Studies, K. P. Bagchi and Co., Kolkata, 1984.
3.      Hazra, K.L., Ladakh A Buddhist Populated Region, Buddhist World Press, New Delhi, 2012.
4.      Hazra, K.L., Lamaism of Tibet & the Dalai Lamas, Buddhist World Press, New Delhi, 2012
5.      Jina, Prem Singh., (ED.), Religious History of Ladakh, Sri Satguru Publications, New Delhi, 2001.
6.      Jina, Prem Singh., Buddhism in the Land of the Gods Lahul- Western Himalayas, Sri Satguru Publications, New Delhi, 2010.
7.      Jina, Prem Singh., Ladakh Buddhist Culture and Tradition, Kalpaza Publications, New Delhi, 2007.
8.      Jina, Prem Singh., Tourism and Buddhist Monasteries of Ladakh Himalayas, Kalpaza Publications, New Delhi, 2007.
9.      Joldan, Sonam., Ladakhis Traditional ties with Buddhist Tibet, Kalpaza Publications, New Delhi, 2012.
10.  Kaul, H.N., Rediscovery of Ladakh, Indus Publishing Company, New Delhi, 1998.
11.  Kumar, Bimalendra Das., Perspective of Tibetan and Buddhist studies, Eastern Book Linkers, New Delhi, 2005.
12.  Pattanayak, D.K., Mishra, Rahul., and Rigzin, Konchok., (Edited),Ladakh-Prabha, Central Institute of Buddhist Studies, Choglamsar, Leh-Ladakh, 2013.
13.  Saxena, Satish Chandra, Trade in Ladakh (During Dogra period 1842-1947 A.D.) Central Institute of Buddhist Studies, Choglamsar, Leh-Ladakh, 2006.
14.  Sangharakshita., Tibetan Buddhism an introduction, Windhorse Publications, Birmingham, 1996.
15.  Shakspo, Nawang, Tserin, A cultural History of Ladakh, Centre for Research on Ladakh, The solitarian, Sabu-Leh, 2010
16.  Singh, Dr. Sanghasen, (Editor) and Singh, Dr. Priyasen, (Asstt. Editor), Ladakh-Prabha, Central Institute of Buddhist Studies, Choglamsar, Leh-Ladakh, 2000.
17.  Shakspo Sonam Wangchuk, Bakula Rinpoche A Visionary Lama and Statesman, published by: Shakspo Sonam Wangchuk, New Delhi, 2008.
18.  Osmaston, Henry and Denwood, Philip(Editors) Recent Research on Ladakh 4&5, Proceedings of the fourth and Fifth International colloquia on Ladakh, Motilal Baranasidass publishers pvt. Ltd, New Delhi, 1995.