Thursday, July 28, 2016

Life of Buddha in Asvaghosa’s Literature: A Bird’s Eye view




Sumanapal Bhikkhu

We come to know from the Chinese work Li-tai-Sanpao-chi and other accounts that Asvaghosa was born in a Brahmana family. Later he was converted to Buddhism and the aim of his conversion was to benefit the world with the noble Law of Buddha. Before being converted to Buddhism Asvaghosa acquired a thorough knowledge of Brahmanical literature including the four Vedas, six treatises on Vedanga, Epics and Darsanas. His works proved that he had a profound knowledge of Sanskrit grammar. At the same time he was equally well versed in the Tripitaka.
Chinese tradition informs as that Asvaghosha was converted to Buddhism by the Patriarch Parsuva, but Tibetan legend gives the credit to Parsava’s discipline Purna of the Sarvastivada School.1 In his life of Asvaghosa Xuang Zang says that Asvaghosha was converted to Buddhism by Parsva after being defeated by him in a public discussion.
The Tibetan legend informs us that after being converted to Buddhism Asvaghosha Dagan to propagate Buddhism in Kusumpura (Modern Patna) not only as a preacher but also as a poet and musician2. With regard to music, the songs Asvaghosa Bodhisattva wrote for the drama the story of Rastrapala3 were a revelation on worldly impermanence and suffering. When performed in the city of Pataliputta, the lyrics so touched the audience of five hundred princes that they subsequently decided to be ordainedand cultivate the Buddha Way.
Asvaghosha propagated Buddhism through his poems in Sanskrit. But he invented his own style and preached the difficult Buddhist philosophy. In his poems Asvaghosha wrote about the life of the Buddha and in doing so he applied interesting literary elements. He believed that through worship and devotion to the Buddha alone a man can attain salvation and become free from the cycle of birth and death.
There were many writers by the name Asvaghosa who glorified the Buddha and his teachings. However scholars have attributed to him the following prominent and authentic works.
1. Buddhacarita,   2. Soundarananda, 3. Sraddhotpada Sastra, 4. Vajrasuci, 5. Sariputra Prakarana, 6. Sutralamkara.

Buddhacarita

I-tseing says about the Buddhacarita4 that it was a voluminous poem which recounted the life & work of the Buddha from the time when he was still living in the royal place till his last hour in the park of the Sala trees. He adds, “It is extensively read in all the five parts of India and in the countries of the south sea (Sumatra, Java and the neighboring islands). He clothed manifold notions and ideas in a few words which so delighted the heart of his reader that they are never wearied of perusing the poem. Moreover it was regarded as a virtue to read it in as much as it contained the Noble doctrine in a neat compact form”. What the Chinese pilgrim says in eulogy of the Buddhacarita we can completely substantiate on the basis of the torso we possess. Here we have in reality for the first time a proper Buddha epic created by a true poet who permeated with love and reverence for the exalted person of the Buddha and profound reverence for the verity of the doctrine of the Buddha represents the life and the teaching of the master in noble language of art which is not artificial. 
We get the complete biography of the Buddha in the Bc from his birth to the Parinirvana. There are 28 cantos in it and these cantosare divided into four equal parts with regard to a biographical account of Buddha: (1) birth and youth until his renunciation, (2) wanderings, asceticism, battle with more Mara and Enlightenments, (3)  teaching, propagationof doctrines in many countries in the four directions, (4) the last journey and Parinirvana.
In the Buddhacarita Asvaghosa has described the activities of the present life of the Buddha. He was kind towards all animals and human beings when he realized that old age, disease, and death are the causes of sorrow of mankind he became very sorry and left home in order to find out a remedy for them.    
In Ramayana Maharsi Valmiki wrote the epic Ramayana to immortalize Rama, Sage Vyasa composed the epic Mahabharata to propagate the teachings of Lord Krishna Likewise the epic Buddhacarita was composed to preach the teachings of the Buddha. This work by Asvaghosha is revered by the Buddhists as Ramayana is respected by the Hindus. It is meritorious to read Buddhacarita epic because it contains the noble doctrine, given in a concise form.5 With the help of Buddhacarita Asvaghosha made the Buddha an incarnation of god like Rama, Krishna, etc.
In Buddhacarita we find the following characteristics:
1. Devotion to Buddha
2. Use of miraculous element
3. Refutation; of Brahmanical practices
4. The conquest of Mara
5. The gradual development of Mahayana
The central interest of the Buddhacarita is the life story of the Buddha. The poet has added to it colorful sense of love in the  harem at night which prompted prince Siddhartha to run away  from the palace and fight against Mara’s army in canto XIII.
The poet has included a number of historical and legendary figures in order to make his stand point more weighty. They are Agastya, Analya, Aja, Ambarisa, Anaranya, Angiras, Asita, Bhisma, Brahma, Dasharatha, Dhruva, Gautama Muni, Gautama Maharshi  Apsara, Jayanta, Lopamudra, Manu, Maruti, Meghawat Pandu, Parasara, Rohini, Sakra, Sibi, Upasunda, Urvasi, Vemdeva, Vasaistha, Videha , Vibhraja, Juhvati etc.
In sculpture we can find all the important events in the life of the Buddha depicted in the Buddhacarita. For instance, in Gandhara Art piece No. 16   (Peshawar No. 2071) we find a divine child being held by two kneeling women with Indra and Brahma pouring water over him from two flasks. Pieces No. 33 and 34 show the marriage of Siddhartha with Yasodhara No. 35 depict the, bridal procession and no. 36 depicts the plugging scene. Here Siddhartha is marketing the tired oxen and birds eating insects.
The poem turns round the history of the Buddha’s life but deals especially with those scenes that have been either lightly the 1st canto describes the establishment of the touched upon or not treated  at all in the Buddhacarita city of Kapilavastu.  

Soundarananda

‘Soundarananda’ was another important work of Asvaghosha. Nanda is the proper name of Siddhartha’s half brother and Sundari is the name of his wife. The aim of the title is to denote both these names which untidily signify perfect beauty.
Soundarananda is an epic written in 18 cantos. In it we find the story of the conversion of Buddha’s half brother Nanda.  
Nanda and his wife were excessively attached to each other. One day when the Buddha came to them for begging they gave nothing to him as they were immersed in the pleasures of the senses with their attendants. When Nanda was aware about this he was ashamed and went to see the sage. Buddha was unwilling to accept any apology and wanted to place the bowl in Nanda’s hands but as Nanda was anxious to return to his wife, he refused to oblige the Buddha so he spiritually attracted Nanda and took him to a monastery. At first Buddha failed in his attempt to convert Nanda and then the job was entrusted to Vaideha Muni.
The Muni appealed to the good sense of Nanda and he consented half heartedly Nanda was shaved and was taken to heaven where heavenly Apsaras were shown to him. Nanda found these beautiful celestial maidens to be more beautiful than his wife and wanted to win them. He was told by the Buddha that in order to obtain them, he must attain heaven at first. Then the Buddha’s disciple told Nanda that the joys of heaven was temporary and a man has to return to earth as soon as his merit is exhausted So Nanda got rid of his desire for  heavenly Apsaras and went to the Buddha with the  request to show  him the path of Enlightenment. The Buddha was very pleased by the transformation of Nanda and preached the Dharma. Nanda went to the forest to meditate and subsequently attained Arhathood. In the end the Buddha advised him to emancipate others also.
Whilst in Buddhacarita there is no express doctrine emanating from the Mahayana school, the concluding portion of the Soundarananda kavya already begins to betray a blaming towards the Mahayana. It is not sufficient for it that Nanda himself should become a saint who attains to Nirvana. He must be an apostle of the faith although it must not be forgotten that even in the Hinayana the obligation of the propagation of faith and proselytism is highly praised, as in a Sutra in Anguttara nikaya. Besides in the third great work of Asvaghosa entitled the Sutralamkara many of the semi-legendary stories are based on a Hinayanic foundation.
The story of Soundarananda is found in Pali Dhammapada and Sutta Nipata. However this Pali version and the Sanskrit version differ in the following respects.
(I). In Pali version, Buddha entered the palace of Nanda at the time when preparation for his marriage and coronation was complete. In the version composed by Asvaghosha the sage entered the house when Nanda and his wife were immersed in pleasure.
(II). In Pali version Sundari cries out to her husband to return soon but in Asvaghosha’s Sanskrit version Sundari exhorts a promise from her husband to return before the point on her cheek is dried.
(III). In Pali version we do not find the name of the person who converted Nanda but   Asvaghosa clearly mentions the name of Ananda as the converted of Nanda.
(IV). In Pali version Nanda simply says that he was practicing austerities against his will.
(V). In Pali version the She monkey (Seen in heaven) is without eye, nose, ears and tail but in Sanskrit she is only with one eye.
(VI). In Pali version Nanda was the butt of ridicule for the monks but in Sanskrit Ananda upbraids Nanda.
The name of Nanda also figures in Theragatha verses 157 and 158 but here we find some changes in the words uttered by the Buddha and in the description of convinced how Nanda was convinced to become a follower of Buddha and Arahat.
As a literary creation Soundarananda is generally regarded as better work tham Buddhacarita. Though no Chinese or Tibetan version of the work is found it is believed that it was more widely read than Buddhacarita.6
Sculptors like many scenes from the Saundarananda but the palace life of Nanda and Sundari seems to have been very popular with contemporary and post – Asvaghosha artists
No. 12.186 ,inn Mathura Museum the two panels represent the palace life of Nanda and Sundari as described  by the poet Asvaghosa.7 We  find Nanda arranging the hair of Sundari, who is  looking into a mirror, while a female attendant is holding a toilet casket. In the lower compartment Sundari is putting a necklace, while looking at the mirror.
In Soundarananda we find many historical, mythical and .legendary figures from pre-Asvaghosa literature while emphasizing his stand point with illustrations.8 They are:.
Adityas, Agni, Analya, Aksamala, Ambarisa. Angiras, Angada, Antidev, Arjuna, Asita, Bhargana, Bharata, Bhusima, Dilipa, Diti, Gautama, Indra, Janmejaya, Kandarpa, Kasyapa, Kanna, Kapila (Sage), Madana, Nahusa, Pandu, Rambhu,  Sagar, Santanu, Urvasi, Ugratapas, Vasava, Vayati, and Yamuna.
Buddhacarita and Soundarnnanda offer two different modes of salvation. In Buddhacarita Siddhartha sought the advice of many teachers. But Asvaghosa refuted their philosophies in course of the poem. In the poem Buddha attained   enlightenment by virtue of Hetu working within him. But in Soundarananda we find Buddha advising Nanda to help others in attaining salvation. Thus in Soundarananda we find the seed of Mahayana. 

Sutralamkara

Sutralamkara or Sutra-Ornament is a collection of legends after the model of the Jataka and Avadanas which are narrated in prose and verse in the style of Indian poetic art. Many of these legends are known to us of old as of Dirghayus or Prince long life and King Sibi. Others already show more of the spirit of the Mahayana or at best a reverence for the Buddha which is more Mahayanist in its tendency.
An example of real Mahayanist is Buddha bhakti is also furnished by No. 68, where Gautami, the foster mother of the Buddha, attains to Nirvana through the grace of the Buddha.

Vajrasuci:

Vajrasui is the work in which Asvaghosa bitterly attacks Brahmanical caste system and is full of illustration from Brahmannical texts.
In the time of the Buddha Brahmanas and Sramanas were two distinguished religious sects of India. In us literature finds many descriptions about them. In the society Brahmanas enjoyed those privileges that were denied to the .people belonging to the other castes. For instance, Brahmanas were honored by the king   and were fined less than the other castes. Even corporal punishments were not inflicted on them under any circumstances. Besides Brahmanas were exempted from certain taxes. With the heap of these evidences it can be proved undoubtedly that the Brahmanas were considered to be superior in social, political and economic matters and the Sudras or the lowest class of the society received a very callous treatment in the hands of the Dharma Sastras and Manu.
This wide gulf between the Brahmanas and Sudras in the society finally resulted in untouchability which, in the following age becomes a cancer for the society.
The Buddha was very diplomatic and tactful waging war against Brahmanism. IN the Buddhist scriptures we find many definitions of a true Brahmana which says that such a person is equal to a Buddhist monk in virtues, learning and conduct.
After attaining Enlightenment the Buddha spent seven days at the foot of the Banyan tree. According to Mahavagga a Brahmana visited him there. There the Buddha explained to him what a true Brahmana means h is the best and the highest kind of man. And who has no blemishes anywhere in the world. Again in the Udana we find the Buddha saying, that having cast – off all sin, making himself clean (of sin), such a Brahmana is Enlightened (i.e. the Buddha)
In Vajrasuci Asvaghosa on the one hand criticized the Brahmanas for their costly sacrifices and Yajnas and on the other hand Brahmana that can be found in their own their literature (Brahmana and Vedic). The Buddha equals such a person to an Arahat.
Both Asvaghosa and his contemporary Vasumitra II refuted for the first time the Brahmanic doctrine of Sankhya and Vaisesika. In the society a new trend had crept in and there was a natural protest movement against the supremacy of the Brahmanic system. Our poet Asvaghosa also felt its impact.
Vajrasuci or Diamond needle is a small Sanskrit work of thirty seven verses. This work shows. Asvaghosa’s profound knowledge of Brahmanical religions literature. In this book the poet has used numerous quotations from the Vedas, Epics, and Law books and has justified the standpoint of the Buddha. Here Asvaghosa defends the  equality of all classes  of men and  says “As there is  similarity in joy and sorrow, in life, intellect , in functions, in conduct or in behavior, birth and  death , sexual enjoyments and in fear, there is indeed no distinction  between a Brahmana and others,  The  poet criticizes the caste system and gives a new definition of the Brahmmana – one who has the Right  conduct (Sila qualities).
According to our  poet a true Brahamin is not he who is born in a Brahmana family, well conversant with Vedic Literature but a man who with words, actions and mind does not trouble or  injure others with body, mind and actions, is  self controlled and a slave to desires , is compassionate  for all sentient beings, is far away from greed and does not accept what ,is not given to him serves  the  cause of others day and night has renounced worldly life, believes in non violence and  is free from attachment, hatred and  contempt.
There are many parallel passages in Vajrasuci and Brahmanavagga of Dhammapada (XXVI. 383 – 423).9 The qualities assigned to a Brahmana in this section of Dhammapada inspired the poet so much that he seems to have borrowed certain lines and words from it. In order to illustrate this point we may compare identical passages in Dhammapada (Brahmananavagga) and Vajrasuci. In Dhammapada Buddha says a man is not a Brahmana by reason of the matted hair or by lineage or his caste. Asvaghosa also agrees with him when he says that a man is not Brahmana because of birth or by lineage or by ceremonies.
In Dhammapada Buddha says” Him I call a Brahmana who accepts nothing in this world, that is not given to him be it long, short, small or big beautiful or ugly.”  Dharmapada says, “No small advantage gains the Brahmana who restrains his mind from things dear to him. He averts his mind from indulging in violence. Again in Dhammapada he says- I call a Brahmana from whom lust, ill- will, pride and envy have fallen off.  Asvaghosa quoting Vaisampayana says, “He who is detached from lust and hatred…. is a Brahmana.”
In short, Asvaghosa the poet has tried to combat the faults of Brahmanamism, and exalt the qualities of sila. The beauty of the work lies in the fact that he has expounded these qualities in the guise of the qualities of a true Brahmana. Indirectly he has preached and encouraged Buddhism.
At the same time he has very wisely recorded the changing trend (From Tapa to morality) of the religious reformers of his time.
In this work we find numerous mention of host of legendary figures and historical personages from different ancient sources.’
Acala, Agastya, Arni, Dronacharya, Gautama, Indra Kapila, Mahesvara, Pandu, Panini, Ravana, Renuka’s son Rama, Surya, Uma, Vyasa and Yudhisthira, etc.

Sraddhapada – Sastra

Sraddhapada –Sastra is one of the world’s most famous and important Mahayana work. However, there is a debate regarding the authorship of it. These who are reluctant to assign its authorship to Asvaghosa argue that there is no affinity of Philosophical discussion between his two Kavyas m (Soundarananda and Buddhacarita) and this work. In these two poems we find mention of the ‘non-entity’ of the soul and there is no mention of ‘Tatthata while Sraddhapada’ is essentially a deviation. It believes in the existence of the soul. Asvaghosa himself says, For the purpose of awakening in all beings a pure faith in the Mahayana, of destroying their doubts and attachment to false doctrines, and of affording them an uninterrupted inheritance of Buddha –Seeds, I write this discourse.
Prof. Suzuki also says that the term Mahayana adopted by Asvaghosa points the greatness of suchness and the term was used by him to prove that this was the safest and surest means of salvation.
According to Haraprasad Sastri this work was composed   by Asvaghosa after Kaniska’s council in Kashmir Dr. Sastri is of the opinion that our poet took the cause of a few Mahayanist who were present in the council but could not impress much. So Asvaghosa composed Sraddhapada Sastra and Sutralamkara.10
From the historical point of view this work by Asvaghosa bears testimony to the evalution of Buddhist thoughts. In Asvaghosa’s time Buddhism was no longer confined to its original home Magadha and the original sutras were but inadequate. When the Buddhists penetrated in the Western part of the Gangetic basin they had to compete with the Hindu philosophers and the region was the birth place of the speculations of the Upanishads. The close contact with Brahmanism influenced Buddhist philosophy profoundly and as a result it adopted Sanskrit language as the vehicle for expressing philosophical thoughts.
Sraddhapada Sastra begins with a hymn and ends with a hymn. It is divided into five sections.
(1) Introductory or reasons for writing the book
(2) General statement about the Mahayana faith.
(3) The explanation itself or the exposition of the Mahayana faith.
(4) The practice of Mahayana faith.
(5) Benefits of the practice of Mahayana Asvaghosa say that he composed the work .keeping the following aims in mind.
1.      To save all sentient beings from suffering.
2.      To present the true meaning of Tathagata’s teaching.
3.      To conserve the gain of those who have made some advance on the path to enlightenment.
4.      To awaken and strengthen the faith of beginners.
5.      To show all the followers, the path to keep their mind free from covering and infatuations.
6.      To help all seekers , to practice right methods of practicing ‘stopping and reflecting’, so as to guard them against the false view points  of both worldly minded people and the disciples of Hinayana (elementary school) besides Madhyama to middle school of Buddhism.
7.      “To explain the expedient means of reciting the Divine the name of Amitabha Buddha and to prove that those who recite are born in Buddha’s pure land.
8.      To show the readers of this treatise, the advantage of one whose faith is awakened, the inestimable advantages of the practice of Dhyana it.

The Sraddhapada Sastra or the Awakening of the faith entitles Asvaghosa to rank as the first systematic expounder of Mahayana.
 In this treatise the poet has explained the fundamental doctrine of the Mahayana faiths its practice and teachings. He says “All men should respectfully believe and not speak evil of it, thereby injuring themselves more and more and others too, destroying every hope of deliverance. In fact the teaching of Asvaghosa is that one becomes identified with truth? Neither by doctrinal belief nor by behavior, but by following the True Faith in the right way and thus ultimately is to become identified with the true principles of Mahayana Buddhism which selfless compassion for all animal life.

Asvaghosa is a poet by nature he is a highly cultivated man by training and religious devotee by conviction.11 Traditional Vedic and Brahamanic conceptions dominated in his contemporary society and the poet has tried to propagate the doctrine of Buddha in a very unassuming style with a very simple language.

In Sraddhapada Sastra the poet devotes much space to preaching. But his expressions are somewhat similar to that of Tripitakas. Though he extols the joys of solitude and meditation, a tendency towards Mahayana can be discerned. Vajrasuci which is a direct attack on Brahmanical custom of caste system is a great work defining a True Brahmana. For Asvaghosa a Brahmana is no less than a Sramana or a monk, or an Arhat Adorned with the qualities by sila.

 Buddhacarita is an integral part of Vinayapitaka of Dharmagupta sect and Soundarananda is based on Dhammapada’s story of Nanda with Varieties, Buddha’s first sermon at Benaras known as Dharma Chakra pavattana Sutra, includes the four noble Truths about suffering and eight fold paths. The same is elaborated by Asvaghosa in Soundargandha.

Footnote:
1.        Life of Asvaghosa quoted by Suzuki, A. E. p. 257f.
2.        Taranath H.B. p. 391.
3.       Rastrapala was born in a wealthy family, in a village called Thullakotthita in the state of Kuru. He  was ordained and practiced under Sakyamuni Buddha. Later, when he returned to his village, his parents tried to rule him away from his monastic vows by distracting him with a woman.  However, the woman was so moved by his instructions on the Dharma that she became a nun. Later, Asvaghosa adapted Rastrapala’s story into a drama, and personally performed the drama in  Pataliputra. Yun, Venerable Master Hsing., Infinite Compassion, less Wisdom the practice of the bodhisattva path, p.60.
4.      T. vol. 4, no. 192. Consists of five fascicles with a total of twenty- eight chapters. Translated by Dharmaraksa, it describes the life of the Buddha from his birth to the distribution of his relics upon his parinirvana. It is Asvaghosa’smost famous work and is a monumental achievement of ancient Indian literature. Yun, Venerable Master Hsing., Infinite Compassion, less Wisdom the  practice of the bodhisattva path, p.59.
5.        R.C. Sharma, Mathura Museum, p.33 (ref. plate III).
6.      Sukomar Sen, (JASB, 1930., p. 81).
7.       B.C. Law in Asvaghosh has discussed most of these references.
8.        Dha. 393: Na jatahi na gottena, na jaccha  hoti brahmano.
9.       yassa rago ca doso ca , mano makkho ca patito,  Sarapor’iva aragga, tam aham brumi brahmano. Dha. 407.
10.    H.P. Shastra, Adv, V. Sang, Intro, p.XXI.
11.   S.K. Dey, H.S. L. p. 76.

Bibliography:
1.      Dutta, Dr. Samir Kuamr., Asvaghosa as a Poet and a dramatist a critical study, the University of Burdwan, Burdwan, 1979.
2.      Keith, A. B., The Sanskrit drama, Oxford University Press , London, 1923.
3.      Khoshla, Sarla., Asvaghosa and his times, Intellectual Publishing House, New Delhi, India,1986.
4.      Law, Bimala Churun., Asvaghosa, The Asiatic Society, Kolkata, 2011.
5.      Mitra, Rajendra Lal.,Sanskrit Buddhist Literature of Nepal, PKI, Delhi, 1970.
6.      Puri, B.N., The Great Kushanas Motilal Banarasidass Publishers Pvt. Ltd. Delhi.
7.      Raghavan, V., An Introduction to Indian Poetics, Macmillan &co, Bombay, 1976.
8.      Sharma,Nripendra Nath., Asvaghos’s Buddhacarita: A study, Punthi Pustak, Kolkata, 2003.
9.      Yun, Venerable Master Hsing., Infinite Compassion, less Wisdom the practice of the bodhisattva path, Buddha’s light Publishing, Los Angeles, 2009.

Ambedkar and Buddhism




Sumanapal Bhikkhu


 Abstract:

Ambedkar’s first recorded contact with Buddhism occurred in 1908, when he was sixteen. At that time he had just passed the matriculation examination of Bombay University in that year. On a function a copy of the life of Buddha was presented to him. Being an auld reader Ambedkar took no time in perusing the book. Rom 1908 to 1917 Ambedkar was fully engrossed in his studies and during that period he went to America and England. At that time he was not giving any special thought to Buddhism. In 1927 a very significant incident occurred which can be described as a milestone in Ambedkar’s progress towards Buddhism. It was the year of the chowder tank campaign. Chowder tank was a water body and caste Hindus used to draw water from it for household purposes. But untouchables were not allowed anywhere near the tank. When the tank was thrown open to the untouchables, the Caste Hindus prevented the untouchables from using their moral and legal rights by hostility. The debate was referred to the court and the right of the untouchables to draw water from the tank was finally established in 1937 by the Bombay High Court. On the night of 25 December of that year. Ambedkar has followers publicly and ceremoniously learned the notorious Manusmriti one of the must celebrated of all such scriptures that preached the gospel of inequality. In October 1935, Ambedkar delivered a powerful speech in which he declared, ‘Though I have been learning a Hindu, I will not die a Hindu’. Then after many years of vacillation on 24 May 1956 Ambedkar and his wife took three Refugees and Fine Precepts from the Burmese monk U. Chandramani.

Ambedkar’s first recorded contact with Buddhism occurred in 1908, when he was sixteen. At that time he had just passed the matriculation examination of Bombay University. It was an extraordinary achievement for an untouchable boy and the Maharashtra celebrated the occasion with a public meeting in his honor. The well known social reformer S.K. Bole acted as the Chowdhar tank campaign. The local high school teacher Krishraji Arjun Keluskar had recently published the life of Buddha in Marathi and a copy of the book was presented to the young Ambedkar. Ambedkar was an avid reader and took no time in perusing the book undoubtedly the story of the Buddha’s great renunciation, his search for truth, his ultimate attainment of enlightenment, and his compassionate activity on behalf of his fellow men all left a deep impression on his young mind. Keluskar, for his part, took a great interest in the young Ambedkar and it was through his good offices that three year later the Maharaja Gaekwad of Baroda granted Ambedkar the scholarship that enabled him to continue his education.

From 1908 to 1917 Ambedkar was fully engrossed in his studies and during that period he went to American and England. At that time he was not giving any special thought to the Buddha’s teaching. Then in 1927 a very significant incident occurred which can be described as a milestone in his progress towards Buddhism. It was the year of the Chowdhar tank Campaign, which in the beginning was a complete success. A resolution was moved in the Bombay Legislative Council by S.K. Bole to the effect that the untouchable classes be allowed to use the water of all places including wells, and dharmasalas which were built and maintained by Government or created by statute, as well as public schools, court, offices and dispensaries. After being adopted by the council, the resolution was accepted, with some reluctance by the Bombay Government. Heads of Departments were directed to give effect to resolutions so far as it related to public places and institutions belonging to and maintained by the Government and the collectors were requested to advise the local public bodies in their jurisdiction to consider the desirability of accepting the recommendation made in the resolution so far as it related to them.

One of the public bodies thus advised was the Mahad Municipality and the Chowdhar tank was one of the amenities administered by the Mahad Municipality. Caste Hindus used to draw water from the tank for household purposes but untouchables were not allowed anywhere near the tank. When the tank was thrown open to the untouchables by the Mahad Municipality in compliance with the Bole resolution, the Caste Hindus prevented the untouchables from using their moral and legal right of using the water of the pond by hostility. The statement continued for three years. Then in March the Depressed classes of the Kolaba district in which Mahad was situated held a conference to deal with the situation. 10000 untouchable representatives from all over the Bombay Presidency attended the conference which took place on the outskirts of Mahad where Ambedkar delivered a string speech. On the second day of the conference a procession was brought out through the streets of Mahad to the Chowdhar tank. There Ambedkar, who led the procession, took the water of the tank, drank it and others did the same.

But their victory was short lived. A rumor was circulated that untouchables were planning to enter the Vireshvar temple. At this the caste Hindus were infuriated and a mob attacked the delegates with bamboo sticks. A riot ensued, in which twenty untouchables were seriously injured and many others were assaulted. The police arrested nine of the troublemakers and later five of them were sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for four months.

But the caste Hindus seemed to have learnt no lessons from the incident. They believed that the action of Ambedkar and other untouchables has polluted the tank and rendered its water unsuitable for use. A purification of the water of the tank was arranged and that was deeply offensive to the untouchables. Ambedkar decided tot continue the struggle and establish their right to draw water from the tank. In the meantime a group of caste Hindus filed a suit claiming that the Chowdhar tank was a private property and got an injunction issued which restrained Ambedkar and his principal tenants from approaching the tank and drawing water from it. Ambedkar and his colleagues decided to postpone the struggle until the court had settled the question of whether or not the Chowdhar tank was a private property.

The right of the untouchables to draw water from the tank was finally established in 1937 by the Bombay High Court but by that time the Mahad Campaign had been ever shadowed by other events. On the night of 25 December of that year, Ambedkar and his followers publicly and ceremonially burned the notorious Manusmriti one of the most celebrated of all such scriptures that preached the gospel of social inequality.

While the burning of the Manusmiriti indicated how far Ambedkar had traveled had traveled from Hinduism. Other incidents occurring in connection with the Chowdhar tank Campaign showed how near he was beginning to draw towards Buddhism. Addressing the opening session of the first Mahad Conference, Ambedkar told his poorly clad and illiterate audience, “No lasting progress can be achieved unless we put ourselves through & threefold process of purification. We must improve the general tone of our behaving, retune or utterance, and revitalize our thoughts”. The threefold purification which Ambedkar spoke was, of course, the purification of the three principles of body, speech and mind which between them make up the individual human being what is especially noteworthy about Ambedkar’s insistence on the need for a threefold purification, corresponding to a threefold division of the individual human being, are found throughout Buddhist literature, they appear to be unknown to the Vedic and post Vedic literature of Hinduism. This suggests that even before the time of the Chowder Tank campaign Ambedkar had not only familaries himself with the Buddhist scriptures but had started thinking in specifically Buddhist terms. It also suggests that he saw progress not as simply material but as having a moral and spiritual basis. As the Buddhist scriptures make clear, the threefold purification is effected by abstention from the ten modes of ‘unskillful’ (i.e. ethically disastrous) action. Body is purified by abstention from killing, stealing and sexual misconduct; speech by abstention from falsehood, abuse, idle chatter and back biting; and mind by abstention from covetousness, hatred and wrong views. These ten constitute what are traditionally known as the ‘ten percepts’ (dasa sila), in their negative rather than their positive from, and it is not surprising that when, towards the end of his life. Ambedkar complied ‘The Buddha and his Dhamma; he should have included in that work a number oh passages from the Pali scriptures dealing with the threefold purification and the ten precepts. In the light of these facts one cannot help thinking that when Ambedkar told the first Mahad conference that no lasting progress could be achieved unless they put themselves through a threefold process of purification he was, in effect, telling them that no lasting progress could be achieved without Buddhism.

The two remaining incidents occurred in connection with the second Mahad Conference. Two prominent non-Brahmin leaders of Maharashtra offered to support Ambedkar in his campaign on condition that no Brahmin should be allowed to participate in the campaign. Ambedkar flatly rejected the two leaders’ offer. Ambedkar believed in seeing people not simply as members of this or that community but as individuals. In these eyes what counted was not birth worth, and in accordance with the latter that men should really be judged. This is of course a basic Buddhist principle, and the fact that Ambedkar should have stated it so unequivocally shows how close he was, even at that time to Buddhism.

But Ambedkar’s closeness to Buddhism was not just in respect of certain principle; it was a also closeness of personal sympathy. In other words, the closeness was not only intellectually but also emotional. To days after his burning of Manusmiriti, Ambedkar and his entourage went on an expedition to a place in the neighborhood oh Mahad in order to see the excavation of some rivers that were believed to date from the time of the Buddha. Deeply moved by the sight of his encourage how the Buddha’s disciples had lined lives of poverty and chastity and devoted themselves to the service of the community.  

The six years that followed the Chowdhar tank campaign were years of vacillation. Sometimes it seemed that Ambedkar had traveled a long way from Hinduism, whether or not in the direction of some other religion and sometimes it seemed that he had not. Actually he was waiting for a change of heart on the part of the caste Hindus. But in the end he was forced to recognize that there was going to be no change of heart on the part of the caste Hindus, and that a casteless Hinduism of which he had sometimes spoken so enthusiastically was only a dream. Indeed, it was a contradiction in terms. Hinduism and the caste system were inseparable and as a result no emancipation of the untouchables was possible within Hinduism.

So Ambedkar became increasingly convinced that renunciation of Hinduism was the way forward for him and his people. The explosion took place at Yeola on 13 October 1935, and it rocked Hindu India in a way that even the burning of the ‘Manusmriti’ had not done Ambedkar delivered a powerful speech in which he described the hardships suffered by the expressed classes in all spheres of life and spoke bitterly of the failure of their attempts to secure their basic human rights as members of the Hindu community. As for himself, he believed that was his misfortune that he had been born an untouchable Hindu.  That was beyond the power to prevent, but it was certainly within his power to refuse to live under ignoble and humiliating conditions. ‘I therefore solemnly assure you’, he declared, and ‘that though I have been born a Hindu, I will not die a Hindu.’

But despite the fact that Ambedkar had now started traveling away from Hinduism and despite the fact he had concluded his address to the Mahar Conference by quoting the words of the Buddha he had apparently still not made up his mind which religion to embrace. On 1-3 September 1939 World War II broke out in Europe and soon involved India, and on 15 August 1947 a truncated India achieved independence. During the eight years spanned by these events Ambedkar reached the Zenith of his political career, first as Labour Minister of the Viceroy’s Executive Council, then as a member of the Constituent Assembly, and finally as Minister for Law in the first Government of free India. In 1948 Ambedkar brought out a new edition of P. Lakshmi Nasaru’s he Essence of Buddhism’ originally published in 1907. In the preface he wrote that he praised the author for his unflagging faith in the Buddha and recommended the book as ‘the best book on Buddhism that has appeared so far.’ He also revealed that he was working on a life of the Buddha, in which he intended do deal with some of the criticisms that been leveled against the teachings of the Buddha, by his adversaries – past and present.

The life of the Buddha must have been the work that was eventually published under the title of the Buddha and his Dhamma, and the fact that Ambedkar engaged on it while still a member of the Cabinet showed that he was more preoccupied with Buddhism than ever. By February 1956, the last chapters of The Buddha and His Dhamma had been written and on 15 March Ambedkar was able write – or dictate – the preface. From this time onwards he and his followers traveled along the road to conversion with increasing rapidity, and incidents that show in which direction they were moving occurred more and more frequently.

24 May was the anniversary of the Buddha’s attainment of enlightenment and, according to the Sinhalese Buddhist calendar, the 2500 anniversary of his Parinirvana or final passing away. On that day Ambedkar addressed a meeting in Nare Park, Bombay, and declared that he would embrace Buddhism in October. On 23 September Ambedkar issued a press note announcing that his conversion to Buddhism would take place on 14 October in Nagpur. On the morning of 11 October he flew from Delhi to Nagpur accompanied by his wife and P.N Tattu, his private secretary. On the evening of 13 October he gave two press conferences, among other things telling the newsmen that his Buddhism would adhere to the tenets of the faith as preached by the Buddha himself, without involving the people in the differences which had arisen with regard to the Hinayana and Mahayana. His Buddhism would be a sort of neo Buddhism or Navayana. At 9:15 the following morning he ascended the dais that had been erected at one end of the Diksha Bhumi or Initiation Ground as the spot came to be called; fifteen minutes later he and his wife took the three Refuges and Five Precepts from U. Chandramani the Burmese Bhikkhu from Kushinara, Fifteen or twenty minutes later after that Ambedkar himself administered the some three Refugees and Five Percepts – together with the twenty two supporting vows of his own devising – to the 3,80,000mens, women and children who had assembled there in response to his called. They had reached the end of their long journey. They had now not only renounced Hinduism but embraced Buddhism. No longer were they untouchables. They were human beings. They were Buddhists. After centuries of separation, they had reestablished contact their spiritual roots and could start producing flowers.

We find that Ambedkar’s thoughts on Buddhism are contained in his article on ‘The Buddha and the Future of His Religion’ and in certain sections of ‘The Buddha and His Dhamma’. The later was until a year after Ambedkar’s death and the article ‘The Buddha and the Future of his Religion’ appeared in the April. May issue of the Mahabodhi. In the first section of the article, Ambedkar boldly declares that what distinguishes the Buddha from the Jesus, Mohammed and Krishna is his self abnegation. By the Buddha’s self abnegation Ambedkar means his refusal to claim for himself the kind of Bible Jesus insists that he is the son of God and that those who wish to enter the kingdom of God will fail to do so if they do not recognize him as such. Mohammed went a step further. Like Jesus he claimed that he was a messenger of God on earth but he further insisted that he was the last messenger. On this footing he declared that those who wanted salvation must not only accept that he was a messenger of God but also accept that he was the last messenger. Krishna went a step beyond both Jesus and Mohammed refusing to be satisfied with being merely that the son or messenger of God, of even with being the last messenger of God, he claimed that he was God himself.

Having described the claims made by Jesus, Mohammed, and Krishna, Ambedkar proceeds to emphasize the every different attitude assumed by the Buddha who has says, never arrogated to himself any such status as they did. He was born a son of man and was content to remain a common man and preached his gospel as a common man.
Beside being distinguished from the three other founders of religions by his self abnegation the Buddha is distinguished from them by the fact that he did not claim infallibility for his teachings. The passage of the Mahaparinibbana Sutta or ‘Book of Great Decease’ to which Ambedkar refers to is probably the well known one, where the Buddha, on the eve of his departure from the world, tells his faithful attendant, ‘When I am gone, Ananda, let the Order, if it should so wish, abolish all the lesser or minor precepts. For Ambedkar, the fact that the Buddha had given liberty to his followers was nothing less than a direct expression of his teaching and a triumphant affirmation of Buddhism as a religion based not on authority but on reason and experience.

In the second section of the article Ambedkar compares Buddhism and Hinduism. Ambedkar says bluntly, ‘Hindus is a religion which is not founded on morality’. This is not to say that in Hinduism there is no morality at all but that wherever morality Hinduism has is not an integral part of it, but a separate force which is sustained by social necessities and not by the injunctions of the Hindu religion. On the other hand, he said, ‘The religion of the Buddha is morality. It is true that in Buddhism there is no God. In place of God there is morality. What God is to other religions morality is to Buddhism.’ This means in Buddhism actions are to be performed or not performed, not according to whether they are, or are not, commanded by God, but according to whether they are, or are not, right or wrong or, in Buddhist terms, skilful or unskillful. God’s commands are the infallible scriptures and in the caste of Buddhism it is the Vedas that are the infallible scriptures. The Buddha rejected the Vedas because they enjoin the performance of rituals involving animal sacrifice and because animal sacrifice controversies the principle of non violence or reverence for life.

Shortly after sharing his thoughts on ‘The Buddha and the future of His Religion’ with the readers of the Mahabodhi and trough them with the Buddhists of the world, Ambedkar left for Ceylon. In May 1954 and again in December 1954 he visited Burma. Then after six years after the appearance of the article the day dawned when thinking about Buddhism was transformed into the reality of Buddhism itself.

Bibliography:

1.      Ambedkar B.R. Dr., The Buddha and his Dhamma, Siddhartha Publication, Bombay, 1194, 3rd, ed.
2.      Ambedkar B.R. Dr., The Rise and Fall of the Hindu Woman, Hyderabad, 1965.
3.      Ambedkar B.R. Dr., Buddha and Karl Marx, Nagpur, 1964.
4.      Ambedkar B.R. Dr., Article on Buddha, Mahabodhi, Calcutta, 1950, April-May.
5.       Ambedkar B.R. Dr., The Buddha and Future of His Religion, Mahabodhi 1950, April-May.
6.      Ambedkar B. R. Dr., Babasaheb Ambedkar and the movement of Untouchables, Vol. I, Edu. Deptt. Govt. of Maharashtra, Bombay, 1982.
7.      Ahir, D.C., Dr. Ambedkar on Buddhism, Siddhartha Publication, Bombay 1182.

8.      Ambedkar and Society Justice, Volume –I, II, Baba Saheb Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Birth Centenary  Celebrations Committee, Ministery of Welfare Govt. of India, Published by the Director Publications Division Ministry of Information and Broadcasting Government of India, Broadcasting Govt. of India Patiala House, New Delhi, 1914.9.
9.      Karunyakara, Dr. Lella, : Modernisation of Buddhism Contributions of Ambedkar and Dalai Lama- XIV, Gyan Publishing House, New Delhi, 2002.
10.  Mahaske, H. Dr. Rajkumar, Reconstructing the World, Chandralok Prakashan, Kanpur, 2012.
11.  Naik, C.D, Professor, Ambedkar’s Perspective on Buddhism and Other Religion, Kalpaz Publication, Delhi, 2009.
12.  Sangharakshita, Ambekar and Buddhism, Motilal Banarsidass Publishers Private Limited, Delhi, 2006.